Federal Funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research Granted, But Will It Really Make A Difference?

By Courtney | 7 Rookie Marks »

Ok, so my full understanding of this is a bit fuzzy. Well, actually, to be completely honest, I’m waaaaaay behind the 8ball on this one. I don’t exactly keep up with the current news of it except to say this, Bush stymied it (and all i can remember is a brief conversation between my dad and I) and Obama has endorsed it. Me, currently, I’ve got some thoughts on it and I’ve got to speak my mind (and my mind, it wanders…all over the place).

Stem Cell Research. Embryonic Stem Cell Research I guess to be more exact. Since that’s what Obama lifted the ban on yesterday, the federal funding of said research ban that is. Research was already going on, but it was privately funded, and now it can be governmentally funded and people are jumping for joy. Me, I don’t know what I’m doing. I mean, I understand that there’s a possibility of cures for a lot of “incurable” diseases that can be found, but what are the implications of it, really. What are the true costs. I guess my problem is a problem of ethics.

I’m pro-life.

A piece of me understands that in some cases we’re talking about embryos that don’t get implanted, embryos that were once frozen but may one day no longer be frozen and will be thrown out like yesterday’s lunch leftovers. I get that part, but does it make it right and are those the only one’s that are going to get used? I’m not sure it does make it right. And I’m fairly sure that they’re not the only ones going to be used.

My whole being screams “why embryonic?”

I wonder why there’s been so much displeasure towards Bush since he vetoed the bill that would allow federal funding of embryonic stem cells in 2001; when we could get stem cells at a less controversial cost by using the stem cells in placentas and umbilical cords. Where’s that stem cell research? I mean, think about it, the placenta and umbilical cord are discarded the same way unused left in the freezer embryos are discarded. So, what’s the difference? Well, there’s the obvious, in one case a life was taken, and in another (for all intensive purposes) a life was brought into this world.

I wonder why, when we live in an age where when you browse through baby magazines or expecting mom magazines there are ads for cord blood registry. “Save your baby’s cord blood because it could save it’s life one day.” embryonic stem cells are so much more important, more the focus, more talked about.

Promise in stem cells? - Diabetes 365 - September 6, 2008

Why embryos, when there are other avenues?

I can remember once, me talking to my dad about bush and federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and cures and all I can remember was that at the end of that conversation he asked me “Courtney, think about, has any promise been shown with what research has been done?” And the answer was no.

So does federal funding change anything? Not really.

7 Rookie Marks On Federal Funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research Granted, But Will It Really Make A Difference?

  1. I don’t claim to be any more knowledgeable than you on this. But one thing I do know. When researchers are NOT allowed to apply for federal funds, their research is, for all intents and purposes, dead in the water. I was a social science researcher and did not need federal funds for the small types of studies I did, but for researchers studying medical and health issues–federal funds are imperative. No other type of funding provides anywhere near the money needed. I really think we will see some major developments in the years to come because this federal funding has been opened up.

    ...said Patricia on March 10th, 2009
  2. I think this is a good summary of the ‘conversation’ you and I had last night. What’s done is done at this point, it will be interesting to see if anything comes in the next few years from all this hype.

    ...said Sara on March 10th, 2009
  3. Yeah, it was all written when I “summoned” you…I had no one to run it past and it made me think of you because in some respects we’re like minded…your opinions were spot on with mine and I think there are many that probably feel this way…

    I think my biggest concern last night was that I was I was writing something that I hadn’t read on other blogs. Everyone else seemed to be rejoicing and happy and it really disturbed me…lol…i guess I was just making sure I wasn’t alone :)

    ...said Courtney on March 10th, 2009
  4. This is great information. We need more people investing in their health using their own adult stem cells. There is a product out for everyone today; it has been on the market for over three years and 5 years in testing. Stem Cells from your bone marrow are available now. I would like to introduce you to the World’s First Stem Cell Enhancer. It is proven by Science and Medical Teams in a Peer Review study.
    “The Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine” “ 8 (2007) 189–202”

    Please take the tour and down load the study. I can send you more educational information on this amazing product. Adult Stem Cells can become any organ, tissue, or muscle in the body. After taking 1 gram of StemEnhance your body releases 3 to 4 million adult stem cells, into the blood stream. This is the body’s natural way to renew, refresh, and rejuvenate itself. We are unleashing a whole new system of the body that has always been there. This is an all natural botanical extract for everyone..http://www.phyl247.biz office 970-985-4076

    ...said phyl247 on March 10th, 2009
  5. Courtney,
    The answers to many of the questions you have are available online. The only thing you’re “fairly sure” about is something you’re wrong about.
    The answer to the basic question, “Why embryonic stem cells?” is one for the scientists. They disagree on whether different stem cells are equally useful for different purposes.
    Since we’re only talking about tissue which was going to be thrown away in any case, to me it’s irrelevant.

    ...said Jerry Nairn on March 11th, 2009
  6. ...said Jerry Nairn on March 11th, 2009
  7. ...said Jerry Nairn on March 11th, 2009

Leave A Mark

Basic Mark Info

* = Required fields

You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: